Opus Heat
This test case has been proposed by Annabelle Le-Hyaric and Michel Fouquembergh formerly at AIRBUS.
We consider a 2D model representative of the neighboring of an electronic component submitted to a cooling air flow. It is described by four geometrical domains in R2 named Ωi,i=1,2,3,4, see figure. We suppose the velocity →v is known in each domain --- for instance in Ω4 it is the solution of previous Navier-Stokes computations. --- The temperature T of the domain Ω=∪4i=1Ωi is then solution of heat transfer equation :
where t is the time and in each sub-domain Ωi, ρCi is the volumic thermal capacity, ki is the thermal conductivity. k1 and k2 are parameters of the model.
ICs dissipate heat, so the volumic heat dissipated Q1 and Q2 are also parameters of the model, while Q3=Q4=0.

One should notice that the convection term in heat transfer equation may lead to spatial oscillations which can be overcome by Petrov-Galerkin type or continuous interior penalty stabilization techniques.
Integrated circuits (ICs) (domains Ω1 and Ω2 ) are respectively soldered on PCB at x1=(ePcb,h1) and x2=(ePcb,h2). They are considered as rectangles with width eIC and height hIC. The printed circuit board (PCB) is a rectangle Ω3 of width ePCB and height hPCB. The air(Air) is flowing along the PCB in domain Ω4. Speed in the air channel Ω4 is supposed to have a parabolic profile function of x coordinate. Its expression is simplified as follows (notice that →v is normally solution of Navier-Stokes equations; the resulting temperature and velocity fields should be quite different from that simplified model), we have for all 0≤y≤hPCB
where V is a parameter of the model.
The medium velocity →vi=→0,i=1,2,3 in the solid domains Ωi,i=1,2,3.
1. Boundary conditions
We set
-
on Γ1∪Γ3, a zero flux (Neumann-like) condition
-
on Γ2, a heat transfer (Robin-like) condition
where h is a parameter of the model
-
on Γ4 the temperature is set (Dirichlet condition)
-
on other internal boundaries, the coontinuity of the heat flux and temperature, on Γij=Ωi∩Ωj≠∅
4. Parameters
The table displays the various fixed and variables parameters of this test-case.
Name |
Description |
Range |
Units |
k1 |
thermal conductivity |
[1,3] |
W⋅m−1⋅K−1 |
k2 |
thermal conductivity |
[1,3] |
W⋅m−1⋅K−1 |
h |
transfer coefficient |
[0.1,5] |
W⋅m−2⋅K−1 |
Q1 |
heat source |
[104,106] |
W⋅m−3 |
Q1 |
heat source |
[104,106] |
W⋅m−3 |
V |
Inflow rate |
[1,30] |
m2⋅s−1 |
Name |
Description |
Nominal Value |
Units |
t |
time |
[0,500] |
s |
T0 |
initial temperature |
300 |
K |
IC Parameters |
|||
ρCIC |
heat capacity |
1.4⋅106 |
J⋅m−3⋅K−1 |
eIC |
thickness |
2⋅10−3 |
m |
hIC=LIC |
height |
2⋅10−2 |
m |
h1 |
height |
2⋅10−2 |
m |
h2 |
height |
7⋅10−2 |
m |
PCB Parameters |
|||
k3=kPcb |
thermal conductivity |
0.2 |
W⋅m−1⋅K−1 |
ρC3 |
heat capacity |
2⋅106 |
J⋅m−3⋅K−1 |
ePcb |
thickness |
2⋅10−3 |
m |
hPcb |
height |
13⋅10−2 |
m |
Air Parameters |
|||
T0 |
Inflow temperature |
300 |
K |
k4 |
thermal conductivity |
3⋅10−2 |
W⋅m−1⋅K−1 |
ρC4 |
heat capacity |
1100 |
|
J⋅m−3⋅K−1 |
ea |
thickness |
4⋅10−3 |